In a very small section
of our text they address juveniles tried as adults. Normally crimes committed
by a minor are handled in the juvenile justice system, unless the crime is
serious or violent. The books prompts us to ask ourselves if the age should be
lowered to be tried as an adult given everything learned in this chapter. In my
opinion there are many factors that are involved in committing a serious and violent
crime for anyone. Mental health, environment, chemical dependency, socio economics
etc. I do take those crimes seriously but I think that any child that commits a
serious or violent crime should be assessed, and all circumstances should be
taken into consideration before they decided to try them as an adult. It is obvious
by our text that teenage brains are not always fully capable of understanding
the impact of their crime. When I was in high school a neighborhood boy named Ryan
Alexander (16 at the time) killed an 8 year old Michael Busby with a lethal
dose of insulin. He also beat the young boy and cut him. I was acquainted with
both of these boys and it was a shock to the whole town. In one of the articles
they described Ryan Alexander’s bedroom having pictures of nude children and
books on how to kill with needles. He was obviously a disturbed child. He used
to walk around in all black with a trench coat on, never a smile on his face,
he was a creepy guy. He was also on a probationary period for other crimes he
had committed. There were obviously multiple issues at play here, I think he
did deserved to be charged as an adult due to all the circumstances and the premeditated
nature. He received a life sentence for his crime. I’m not sure how I feel
about a life sentence for a 16 year old.
I guess if I had
unlimited research for this subject I would like to see a system be put into
place for determining to try teens as adults. I’d also like to know how a teen
could change developmentally after serving a long sentence. Could they be rehabilitated?